Denied+ Abuse Report: Mami aka PARA

Zero2222

Well-Known Member
16 Aug 2019
53
2
8
24
Mars
Admin's Name Mami aka PARA
Time and date 30/08/2019
Server Elite HunterZ v3
Description
I saw this admin abusing her / him power and saying that player 'watermelon' was annoying and tried to ban that player. I do not see this as any rule break. I also saw this admin said to player the_0ne that he abused the votekick system and he wasn't. He tried to votekick the admin for some reason each round.

Reporting an abuse is a serious matter. Do you hold all the proofs requested for an abuse request? Yes
 

Zero2222

Well-Known Member
16 Aug 2019
53
2
8
24
Mars
20190830191806_1.jpg
 

Dataworm

Ex-Admin
Ex Admin
22 Feb 2015
1'247
361
83
Side-note: the_0ne often tries to votekick a lot of people for no real reason. So yeah abusing the votekick system might be true in that case even though I don't know if people can get banned for such a thing ;-)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hammaplayz

Zero2222

Well-Known Member
16 Aug 2019
53
2
8
24
Mars
@Dataworm, why would they add a votekick system if they would keep saying it is abuse. This admin does not to say things that she or he is not sure about it. Dataworm I also saw he/she votekick someone after that player the_0ne got blocked and yes dataworm I saw this player watermelon got banned for abusing the votekick system. You might wanna keep an eye on that administrator. Admins can check the chatlog (kek)
 
Last edited:

Sheyla

Well-Known Member
EliteHunterz Clan Member
Ex Admin
Donator
11 Oct 2014
866
894
93
26
Germany
Hey I'm the Admin ("Mami") who said that it was pretty much annoying because it is.

Votekicking people once or //twice for fun is okay but doing it over and over/spamming/even after warnings >on purpose .. for no real "reason" is for me punishable/banable offense specially if players like watermelon & the_0ne don't listen to Admins.
 

Havoc

Retired SPA/HA
Retired SPA/HA
27 Sep 2014
4'755
1'392
113
26
Denmark
L 08/30/2019 - 18:00:25: "[Ξн] Mami ♡<12002><[U:1:26316967]><>" froze "Watermelon⌁ᴸᴱᴳᴱᴺᴰ<12100><[U:1:933809583]><>"
L 08/30/2019 - 18:00:31: "[Ξн] Mami ♡<12002><[U:1:26316967]><>" kicked "Watermelon⌁ᴸᴱᴳᴱᴺᴰ<12100><[U:1:933809583]><>" (reason "stop being annoying else BAN")
L 08/30/2019 - 18:13:17: "[Ξн] Mami ♡<12002><[U:1:26316967]><>" banned "Watermelon⌁ᴸᴱᴳᴱᴺᴰ<12118><[U:1:933809583]><>" (minutes "10") (reason "Stop abusing that votekick command")

PARA warned/kicked Watermelon for constantly votekicking everyone for no reason, as he didn't stop PARA asked me if she could give him a short ban and i agreed as the player was obviously being a troll and not listening to warnings.

We indeed have a votekick system which can be used to votekick someone who actually deserves it but randomly throwing votekicks at anyone for no reason is exploiting the system and being annoying.

Ban was just 10 minutes to hopefully stop the player from doing it again in the future.

No abuse seen here.
 

Sheyla

Well-Known Member
EliteHunterz Clan Member
Ex Admin
Donator
11 Oct 2014
866
894
93
26
Germany
Plus I warned them both on cbble yesterday
 

Zero2222

Well-Known Member
16 Aug 2019
53
2
8
24
Mars
@PARA, I also have a screenshot of you trying to ban a player for being 'annoying' which isnt rule breaking and I also saw you slaying that player for being 'annoying' which results in admin abuse and you can see it from message from @Havoc in this conversation plus how are you so sure of he is abusing the votekick system? As you admins said that random votekicking is exploit and para you said doing it one is twice is fun isnt also right what you
said.
 
Last edited:

Lotus

Boomer
Staff member
Special Admin
Forum Moderator
Donator
9 Jan 2016
1'916
837
113
25
Canadia eh?
One of the rules says essentially to listen to admins, I can't recall the exact words but that's generally what is there. This is to fill in grey areas not specified by exact rules, for instance exploiting the votekick function. Spamming the votekick on an admin fills the chat and can be annoying. The player was warned through various methods and also warned yesterday for the same thing, and they continued, a short ban was justified, whether the warning was "please stop doing that" or "its annoying stop" or anything else, the player continued and was therefore punished. Spamming a votekick on an admin is pretty obviously a troll. As you can see para also verified the ban with a SPA, there was no abuse here as havoc already said, which should have been the end of this thread.
 

Zero2222

Well-Known Member
16 Aug 2019
53
2
8
24
Mars
@Lotus, I also have screenshots of admin @PARA trying to ban player watermelon for jumping on the admins charachter and she or he slayed him for being annoying and the player could have been killed which results in admin abuse. The player watermelon and player the_0ne werent spamming with the votekick system because they were votekicking a different player which isnt spamming. There could be a reason why they wanted them to be votekicked
 
Last edited:

NorthernLight

Ex-Admin
Ex Admin
Donator
15 Dec 2015
783
528
93
26
Germany
It's the same with watermelon.
He's also spams the votekick system jumps on para's or my head (like yesterday), blocks the view in a fight, yea and the flashlight spamming.
After warnings still the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kr1pT1c