Handled# Abuse Report: niko777

[blair]

Admin's Name: niko777

Time and date: yesterday

Description: you banned me without a demo. "all bans must have demo" if i do remember correctly.. smh smh #whatadminjob

On which server did this happen? (Specify either the name or the ip): all

Reporting an abuse is a serious matter. Do you hold all the proofs requested for an abuse request?: Yes

 

[Nikooo777]

i don't need demos.
If i needed any i'd simply override the rule... feels good to be the boss here doesn't it?

 

[Skela]

Description: you banned me without a demo. "all bans must have demo"

I just have to correct you, blair. All permanent bans must have a demo. And from what I can see you're not permanent banned.

 

[blair]

I must correct you aswell. last time i checked, only the admin in question and the person that submits the report is allowed to reply. so wyd replying?

 

[Havoc]

Jesus...

Only the reporter, the admin in question and ha/spa are allowed to reply but to this troll report it doesn't really matter. Only bans for hacking require a demo. This wasn't for hacking, this was for your trollish stupid behavior on forum, teamspeak etc. What is your point of this report? Reporting the person in charge of everything? Who should remove him if he did wrong? In this case he's all right and you're just trying to make him look bad but you only manage to make yourself looking worse than you did already.