Ban request [RLY]ComputerCrank

vaalaria

Well-Known Member
21 Feb 2011
53
1
8
37
Romania
name of the player: [RLY]ComputerCrank
steam id: STEAM_0:1:37991547
which server: v3
why: lift block
when: 12 am May 14 212
proof: screen shot
 

Attachments

  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    347 KB · Views: 356
i am preaty sure he was meaning stair blocking lol

in this case he can clearly be standing on heads and from the background you can see its the lift :|

What if he just fell down and moved right after this picture was taken?
 
nevermind.

and just for the record he didn't.

P.S. ah and btw its the same for every illigal camping spot like trees or platform glitch. in that cases they could have jumped the next second the screen was made. so by that thinking why should those get banned.
 
Last edited:
It's not that we're not trusting you, it's just the way it is.
 
ok i understand you need solid proof and a demo is a solid proof. but as i was saying about he camping spots its bassicaly the same thing and all ban request with screen for illical camping spots got banned but wthascreen on lift bocker no.

anyway too much talk for now.

i will remember to make demos from now on

oh and btw check this: http://forum.elite-hunterz.info/showthread.php/1136-Elevator-Blocker-4way-Tunnel
 
Last edited:
ok i understand you need solid proof and a demo is a solid proof. but as i was saying about he camping spots its bassicaly the same thing and all ban request with screen for illical camping spots got banned but wthascreen on lift bocker no.

Players shouldn't have anything to do up in the tree (for example), there for it's a ban and a screenshot is enough.
A lift blocker could just have fell down from the top and landed on the head (i know i kinda much drawing it out now but i hope you got the point).
 
I can't speak for Viper in this case but for me it's poor evidence when it comes to pictures.
 
i think this is not bannable, needs warning and also it's not a valid proof