Denied [CS:S ALL/CS:GO ZM] Report a player: Begotten

sxmity

Well-Known Member
22 Apr 2023
318
53
28
16
Greater Manchester, UK (GB)
gamebanana.com
Name Begotten

SteamID [U:1:1561078761]

Server [CS:S] Zombie Hunting V3

Time and Date Currently, as of July 9th, 2023.

Report Reason Heavily Insulting/Swearing, Disruptively spamming

Additional Information
Changing aliases and having sexual conversations.

Proof Screenshot
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (1).JPG
    Screenshot (1).JPG
    268.3 KB · Views: 97
  • Screenshot (2).JPG
    Screenshot (2).JPG
    350.2 KB · Views: 99
  • Screenshot (3).JPG
    Screenshot (3).JPG
    376.3 KB · Views: 96
  • AliasesHL.PNG
    AliasesHL.PNG
    35.9 KB · Views: 96
  • Screenshot (4).JPG
    Screenshot (4).JPG
    301.5 KB · Views: 93
  • Screenshot (5).JPG
    Screenshot (5).JPG
    285.8 KB · Views: 91
Last edited:
I don't really see the "heavily insulting/swearing" part.
All I can see is him giving his somewhat vulgar opinion on a anime spray (just my guess, as your screenshot don't show to what or whom he said it), I can also see the sexual conversations but again, your screenshots don't provide enough to issue a ban/gag, warning in game at best if even.

As to his nicknames, screenshot from hlstats is not a valid proof.
 
I don't really see the "heavily insulting/swearing" part.
All I can see is him giving his somewhat vulgar opinion on a anime spray (just my guess, as your screenshot don't show to what or whom he said it), I can also see the sexual conversations but again, your screenshots don't provide enough to issue a ban/gag, warning in game at best if even.

As to his nicknames, screenshot from hlstats is not a valid proof.
I understand your perspective, but based on the evidence I have, I still believe that the behavior in question was still inappropriate. While the screenshots may not provide the full context, they do show instances of heavily insulting/swearing behavior and sexual conversations. Additionally, while the screenshot from hlstats may not be definitive proof, it does suggest a pattern of behavior that is concerning.
 
I can't punish anyone based on patterns and/or suggestions, I need a valid proof of an actuall rulebreaking.