I want that my ban will be unlifted because there is no argument for a ban. Even assuming if really was trying to damage Stefan_Krips reputation, where is it written that that's a reason for a ban? May I kindly remember on those rules:
Non-Bannable offences:
- Light insulting (noob, nap, lolly)
- Light spamming (222222, omg, lucker)
- Stealing names
- Stealing clantags
- Temporarily blocking a person (depends on the situation)
- Temporarily blocking the main elevator (4way only)
- Light porn spray logos (must not show genitals!)
So my ban from "The Dude" was based not because of insulting/damaging Stefan_Krips reputation, it was based because I used nearly the same name as him. Even your admin who first kicked me and then banned me never used in his argumentation that I damaged Stefans reputation, he just wrote that I need to change my name immediately. I was not willing to do that and therefore got a ban. (4 hrs) Again: Why I was not willing to do that? Firstly, because I am convinced that the right is fully on my side. Secondly, by using a similar name as "Stefan_Krips" all insulting from him side/damaging my reputation as former BKA completely stopped.
In the forum now I must read I was rulebreaking/blocking today, 17.09.2018, during the game. Obviously this is wrong. See the chatlogs. There was user "Quaresma" who complained about "Stefan_Krips" that he was blocking, "Stefan_Krips" then insulted him as an "idiot" and admin was doing nothing. I swear and know that Quaresma was meaning the "other Stefan_Krips" and not me, and the fact that "the other Stefan_Krips" answered to Quaresma is another proof.
So all in all I was NOT blocking today, nor the breaking rules nor by having nearly the same name as "Stefan_Krips" breaking the rules from that server. This band is absolutely unfair and I ask you to uplift that ban. If a normal admin is not willing to look proper into that matter then I ask a main admin to do so. It's a complex topic and you need a bit of intelligence to make a PROPER JUDGEMENT about that topic. What I read before from Lotus was not proper at all, just standard blablabla without any proofs/clear reason. Just saying "we know you are a blocker", "you want to damage his reputation" IS NOT ENOUGH. He can not say about me what I want. I can say for myself I DON'T WANT TO DAMAGE HIS REPUTATION, I WANT THAT HE STOPS INSULTING/BLOCKING OTHER PLAYERS.
Now we need a decision and I ask you to do a proper decision with clear and understandable arguments. What Lotus wrote is not enough, so I strongly deny his argumentation.
As long as I am not damaging the reputation of Stefan_Krips, I will continue to play with the name "Stefan_ Krips".
Argumentation of The Dude why he kicked me: "Griefing". THERE IS NOTHING WRITTEN LIKE BREAKING RULES/BLOCKING. Only thing: "Griefing".
So don't tell me I was blocking or damaging the reputation of "Stefan_Krips"!!!